top of page
Search
Writer's pictureDick Clarke, CHT-Admin

So-Called Mild Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy


So-called mild (1.4 ATA or less) hyperbaric chambers continue to proliferate at a seemingly unprecedented rate. They do so on the strength of promoting wholly unproven and in many cases implausible benefits to the desperate, the gullible and the vain. Most commonly, these chambers are of a soft-walled inflatable design but there are hard-shelled low-pressure versions out there as well.


Inflatable hyperbaric chambers are approved by the FDA based on “substantially equivalent” to the air-filled Gamow (pronounced Gam-of) Bag, pictured below. And approval is limited to treatment of “Acute Mountain Sickness (AMS) and its associated mild symptoms”. Readily apparent upon the most cursory of internet searches is that this chamber type is proposed as treatment, and I use this term loosely as it is an undoubted exercise in futility, for anything but AMS. Multiple occupancy utilization is not uncommon, another FDA violation, and one company manufacturers a four-person capability. Mild hyperbaric chamber operators and users further violate FDA approval when incorporating an oxygen breathing system.

Following a recent and concerted educational effort, State and Local Fire Marshals have begun closing businesses promoting mild hyperbaric oxygen therapy due to non-compliance with NFPA 99 Chapter 14 standards. One affected commercial enterprise reacted by proposing that because their inflatable chambers offer therapeutic not medical services and represent a lower risk than traditional hyperbaric chambers, they should not be held accountable to current standards. Further, they proposed a new NFPA category be developed specific to this chamber type. I was one of two individuals who offered public statements against these proposals during a August 1 NFPA meeting. My comments may be downloaded from the PDF file below.

Encouragingly, the NFPA Hyperbaric Facilities Technical Committee voted unanimously to reject both proposals.


In the week prior to that meeting, the American Medical Association formally opposed the use of the mild hyperbaric therapy…see link.


1,461 views2 comments

Recent Posts

See All

2 Comments


George B.
George B.
Jun 21

I have been using the hyperbaric chamber for the last 3 months, 1.5-2 atms, in pursuit of aleviating my debilitating Long Covid symptoms. I was highly scheptical in the begining, but after 2.5 years of horrible morning brain fog, early exhaustion in the day, and the additiona pains and aches, for seemingly no reason, I was willing to try anything. Short anser: it works! I've reduced my initial 1.5 hours of brain fog in the morning to 10-15 minutes, and it is not as thick as it was initially, but more like a mild hangover. I still get tired during the day, but I recover quickly with 10-20 minutes rest. I do 1-1.5 hours of treatment every afternoon, after work,…

Like

Unknown member
Mar 16

I have some questions for you. Basically want to pick your brain if you'd be willing.


Thanks

Like
bottom of page